-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 768
{lang,toolchain}[lfbf/2025b,system/system] lfbf v2025b, SciPy-bundle v2025.07 #24482
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
{lang,toolchain}[lfbf/2025b,system/system] lfbf v2025b, SciPy-bundle v2025.07 #24482
Conversation
… and patches: numpy-2.3.2_fix-llvm-tests.patch
Updated software
|
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
|
With FlexiBLAS default ( Test report by @Thyre |
|
With FlexiBLAS default ( Test report by @Thyre |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
|
Failed due to BLIS not knowing about Test report by @Thyre |
|
With Test report by @Thyre |
|
With FlexiBLAS default ( Test report by @Thyre |
Signed-off-by: Jan André Reuter <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jan André Reuter <[email protected]>
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
|
With FlexiBLAS default ( Test report by @Thyre |
Signed-off-by: Jan André Reuter <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jan André Reuter <[email protected]>
|
Test report by @boegel |
We need easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3855 here for Boost 😄 |
|
Test report by @boegel |
|
With Test report by @Thyre |
|
With Test report by @Thyre |
|
Test report by @boegel |
|
Tested with FW PR at easybuilders/easybuild-framework@232ef0b Test report by @Crivella |
|
NOTE Only tested ECs from #24516 Test report by @Crivella |
|
Test report by @boegel |
|
I'm seeing trouble here with BLIS on Test report coming up. I won't let this block this PR though, we can follow up in an issue & separate PR, since this smells like a bug in BLIS to me... edit: |
|
Test report by @boegel |
|
Test report by @Thyre |
Interesting, this doesn't show up with Neoverse V2. Probably worth opening an issue for to figure out where things go wrong. |
|
@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3 |
|
@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... - notification for comment with ID 3621057014 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
…asyconfigs into 20251107090723_new_pr_lfbf2025b
Signed-off-by: Jan Andre Reuter <[email protected]>
|
Test report by @boegelbot |
…asyconfigs into 20251107090723_new_pr_lfbf2025b
|
Let's get this merged, we can follow-up on the failing |
boegel
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
|
Test report by @boegel |
|
Test report by @boegel |
|
Going in, thanks @Thyre! |
(created using
eb --new-pr)This is part of a series of PRs adding an LLVM toolchain for
2025b.Right now, the modules use
llvm-compilers, whereas the framework PR is usingLLVMtc. I'll adapt based on the result of the discussion in Slack.Requires:
Also contains
llvm-compilersto that this can be tested independently from #24481Test reports:
edit (by @boegel):
follow-up for failing
numpy/scipytests on Arm:lfbf/2025btoolchain #24764